Click here to
The British Establishment of today is corrupt, leftist, thoroughly unpleasant, and leaning towards existing solely as a regime of liberal fascism. That’s the point I’m trying to make within this project. Whilst exploring the controversial tendencies of our beloved British Establishment, I aim to expose the radical and extremist measures that are taken by said Establishment to violently oppose smaller political parties through the use of their greatest asset – the media.
This document aims to explore the British establishment on two distinct levels :-
- How is the Establishment leftist?
- How does the Establishment enforce leftist politics through the mainstream media?
- How does it affect the British National Party?
Throughout the document, I will be referring to an interview I gave to Cheryl Dunn, the newly-appointed North East Regional Organiser for the British National Party. A dedicated activist, and a dedicated nationalist, she has provided me with key points that support my theory about the Leftist Establishment.
Chapter 1 – What is the British Establishment?
The British Establishment has changed. Britain was once a powerhouse for industrial activity, community spirit, hope and prosperity –something supported by the Governments and Establishment prior to the 1948 British Nationality Act. It seems that since then, when mass immigration was first implemented in Britain that everything has changed – and I don’t just mean the people.
The Establishment in Great Britain to many has become a ‘soft touch’, though I believe the problem’s much worse. Instead, I thoroughly believe that Britain is now subject to an incredibly unpleasant, leftist and treacherous Establishment that’s systematically destroying everything that Britain used to be.
So how can we define the Establishment, and what does Britain’s Establishment actually consist of? And what does it do?
The term ‘Establishment’ is particularly controversial, and is certainly a rather scary word to some. The idea that there really is a hidden force in British politics and society that seems to regulate everything from racial make-up, to cultural diversity is indeed a worrying thing. But it exists. It refers to a group of elite people, organisations and even businesses that have an unprecedented power over a nation. The British Establishment can easily be defined by the leftist politics of the last decade, and indeed the leftist politics that currently exist under the ConDem regime.
The Establishment, however, also includes Bureaucrats and bigots that work in British political departments, and Quangos (Quasi Autonomous Non-Governmental Organisations) - for instance, the huge amount of control that is found within the supposed ‘Equalities and Human Rights’ Commission currently headed by Trevor Phillips. Needless to say, the corruption, fascism and power that comes from this Establishment is funded by the taxpayer – most of whom don’t even realise what is actually going on.
A brief breakdown of the British Establishment can be seen as followed:
- Leading politicians (Whether that’s MPs, MEPs, or otherwise), including the Cabinet, and of course the Prime Minister
- Senior Civil Servants
- Chairs and workers of Commissions
- Financiers, bankers, and those involved with the regulation of the British economy
- Governors of the BBC (which is something this paper will focus on particularly)
Bella Abzug, once member of the US House of Representatives, was a prominent feminist of the 20th century who sums up the nature of this paper in one of her most famous quotes: - “The Establishment is made up of little men, very frightened”.
Whilst this is indeed in reference to the United States Establishment, her comments sum up precisely the point I’m trying to make. The Establishment (no matter what country we’re discussing, as it is true that Establishments all over the world prove to be corrupt, even amongst the strongest of ‘democracies’) is made up of liars, con artists, and men who are scared that their dream of a multicultural, multiracial world and even eventually a European super-state (through consistent expansion of the European Union) will not become a reality; they become the very thing that they supposedly oppose. Fascists.
According to the earlier mentioned Cheryl Dunn, the Establishment can be described as follows:
“The Establishment, as the name suggests, is that which has developed over time and "established" itself. This is not necessarily formed by one identifiable group of people, politicians or civil servants but refers to all those people who have, over time, assumed or ascended into some form of authority or power. The defining characteristic of the Establishment as I would see it is not money or class but rather a need to protect and maintain the status quo and remain THE Establishment. It is interesting that within the Establishment, various factions (such as political parties) are happy to publicly despise each other and plot each other's demise, but when a robust-enough threat to The Establishment appears, they will combine to protect themselves and each other if required.”
Chapter 4 will look more closely about the fascism that currently exists within the leftist British Establishment, and how it affects smaller parties (and not just the British National Party).
This is the face of democracy in the United Kingdom. It’s a sad state of affairs when members of a legitimate British political party are violently attacked by State-funded, Labour-funded, and MP-supported organisations like the supposed ‘Unite Against Fascism’.
This alleged anti-fascist organisation is the perfect example of how leftist, fascist politics are being normalised by the British Political Elite. The organisation believes that by violently opposing British political parties and organisations that stand up for the culturist rights of native British people (The English, Scots, Irish, Welsh – or perhaps, the Norse, the Celts, and the Anglo Saxons)
The question to many, however, seems to be ‘How can fascism be at all associated with leftism?’ A question like this can be forgiven, given the modern misconceptions about Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany. It is generally assumed that the National Socialism of the 1940s was a right-wing agenda, when it couldn’t be further from the truth.
Leading Scholars of Fascism, including Eugen Weber, A. James Gregor, Renzo De Felice, Zeev Sternhell and George Moss, have already suggested that Hitler’s regime was not fascist – but that’s neither here nor there. In fact, Sternhell once wrote, in response to the 1963 book ‘Fascism In Its Epoch’ by Ernst Nolte, the following:
“In some ways, Ernst Nolte's approach recalls that of Gerhard Ritter and Friedrich Meinecke: Thomas More, for Ritter, Machiavelli, for Meinecke, and now Maurras, for Nolte, are so many proofs of the universality of evil, so many proofs that it was almost by accident, by a mere conjunctionof political circumstances, that the Nazis arose in Germany” – suggesting that Hitler had no real ‘fascist’ agenda, and his ideology simply arose due to political and social circumstances at the time. So Hitler, despite common belief, wasn’t necessarily fascist – though whether or not he, and his regime, was fascist is a matter that would only affect the arguments of leftists. Proving that large political and ideological misconceptions happen all the time – which is certainly the case of culturist groups in the United Kingdom, thanks to a leftist elite that continually lie to the electorate. If Hitler was fascist, then the leftist Establishment would be incorrect to suggest that organisations like the British National Party, British People’s Party, National Front, the movement ‘English Defence League’ and other nationalistic and culturistic groups were essentially ‘Nazi, fascist’ groups would be incorrect. If Hitler was a fascist, which is the general consensus under a loose, modern ‘definition’ of fascism (that remains as unclear as ever, with no real definition of the word ever actually existing), then the leftist Establishment’s claim about nationalist and culturist groups would still be true. We need to stop living in an era that treats Nazism, Fascism, Nationalism and Culturism as one thing.
The truth about Nazism is long and complex, but for the purpose of comparing the modern British Establishment to Nazism, I will take the opportunity to describe one of the most distinct reasons why Hitler and the Nazis were seen as right wing, when their socialist and left wing tendencies were substantial parts of their policy and agenda. We know that for decades, the left has been guilty of cherry-picking facts in order to create an opinion (Of course, we know that this is still true today, where the left has cherry picked facts to create an opinion – just look at the decades of covering up Muslim rape of young white girls, in order to avoid the BNP being proven right after their publication of ‘Racism Cuts Both Ways’ in 2001. The Third Reich was guilty of cherry picking facts, in an effort to make Nazism appear as the opposite of popular forms of Communism at the time.
The Third Reich accomplished this by exaggerating the roles of industrialists and conservatives, and hence shrinking socialist and leftist aspects of Nazism to mere trivia.
This just goes to show that the British Establishment’s knack for cherry picking facts to create an opinion is along the lines of Nazi deceit. Even Cheryl Dunn, previously quoted BNP National Organiser is quoted as saying:
““The country's political elite are now happy to mix-and-match policies in the interests of attracting votes.”
Of course, the idea of cherry picking facts and presenting them out of context is also a great way of attracting votes from a new part of the electorate.
People might struggle with the idea that the Establishment is leftist particularly because incumbent Government exists primarily of Tories. Of course, the statement seems more believable given than the Government is in fact a coalition, consisting of Liberals also – but even with a Tory Government I suspect that we would see the same liberal, fascist and violent politics in place. Why? Because David Cameron openly supports the UAF, and their chairman, the thoroughly deceitful and bigoted Sayeed Warsi constantly speaks about the evil of the BNP.
The very fact that they believe that multiculturalism is right, and believe that it should have (as it was) been imposed without any democratic mandate means two things – the old gang parties are both liberal and opposed to democracy. This is disgusting, unBritish and not welcome in a democracy. The problem is that people don’t seem to be able to see what’s happening right under their nose.
The leftism arguably became more prominent after the rise of the Labour Party. Here, Cheryl Dunn of the British National Party agreed with me once again, saying:
“The Establishment has, since the rise of the Labour Party, certainly moved more to the left than in previous centuries. Many of the policies now adopted as mainstream can be described as post-Marxist and even members of traditionally right-of-centre groups would now be accepted as primarily leftist.”
It doesn’t matter if the Tories are supposed to be conservative, the LibDems liberal, and Labour populist. These are the old gang parties that want nothing other than to gain power – no matter what they have to do. Just look at the coalition disaster between the Tories and LibDems. Was it not just in May 2010 when Nick Clegg claimed in his election broadcast that it was ‘time for promises to be kept’
Finally, I also asked Cheryl about her opinion concerning alleged leftism within the Establishment, and she replied with:
“ Prior to the 2010 General Election, Mrs Gillian Duffy questioned the then Prime Minister Gordon Brown on the economic viability of uncontrolled immigration. She was branded a "bigot" by Mr Brown and the other parties were quick to condemn him for his duplicity and poor manners. The same leaders of these political parties were previously equally quick to call Mr Nick Griffin and the British National Party bigoted when they asked a similar question, however. Once it became apparent that the public sympathy was with Mrs Duffy not only for the way she had been ill-treated by Mr Brown but also on the factual nature of her question, Immigration became a key factor in discussions prior to Polling Day.”
What better example to provide you with than David Cameron referring to Nick Griffin as a scumbag during his annual Conservative conference. It seems that despite the BNP’s legitimacy and increasing amount of votes, the politicians of Westminster are refusing to accept that people really do want change. And not the kind of change that David Cameron referred to in his election campaign.
S0 how exactly is the British National Party, as a smaller opponent to the established Political Elite, affected by leftist British politics? One such kind of leftist bullying is racism. Now, racism might not seem like the usual leftist trait, but consider this.
Leftist states like the UK absolutely adore the idea of multiculturalism. At least, the Political Elite do, not so much the working class people and traditionalists, however. This idea of multiculturalism is a classic leftist trait, and with it comes horrific levels of racism. The idea of multiculturalism is the idea that all cultures and races can live harmoniously within one state, accepting each other’s values and gradually destroying the indigenous culture and religion. This genocide of a whole race of Anglo, Saxon, Celtic and Norse people was endorsed by the Tony Blair government, and was indeed started under his administration.
Multicultural policies first began in the United Kingdom from the 1970s and 1980s, though Tony Blair’s government was a real corner stone. During 2004, the amount of immigrants who became British citizens reached a record of 140,795. This was a 12% increase over 2003 figures, and since then, it seems that it hasn’t stopped.
Now, this multicultural scheme (which wasn’t democratic, as there was no mandate, and no will from the public – it was simply a racist tactic enforced upon the people without a referendum) is the main leftist trait that currently affects the British National Party. The British National Party is the only real party that is standing up for the rights of the indigenous white people of these islands (of course, apart from extremist and unacceptably racist parties like the National Front and British Peoples Party).
Given the nature of the party, the racism that is the destruction of the indigenous races and the constant ignoring of these people and their rights has a dramatic effect on the success of the party. Naturally, there are millions of racial foreigners in this country that immediately would never consider voting BNP. Why? Potentially because the Labour Government brought them here. If not, it’s because of the lies spread by the leftist media because of anti-white racism. Anti-white racism is very much present these days, and is evident in the recent scandal involving Jack Straw.
Jack Straw, Labour politician, recently raised concern about the cover up of Muslim gangs attacking and raping young white women. It seems interesting that Labour should suddenly pick up on this racism that was ultimately their fault (given that they were responsible for the cover up) when it was actually a Britihsh National Party document that announced this racist scandal back in 2001. Of course, the Establishment don’t want you to know this – hence the recent censorship of Derek Adams, BNP candidate in the Saddleworth election, on the BBC’s North West politics Show when he mentioned the 2001 document and the Labour cover up.
2001 saw the release of ‘Racism Cuts Both Ways’, a document produced by the BNP that aimed to outline the anti-white racism that was occurring in Britain that is affecting the lives of millions of Brits, as well as the success of the British National Party as the only alternative political movement in the UK.
Of course, one of the best examples of Establishment and Leftist bullying is the recent Equalities and Human Rights Commission case against the British Natioanal Party. This followed the incident whereby the EHRC ordered the BNP to change its membership rules (which, at the time, only allowed indigenous British people to join the party), or face legal charges. The commission suggested that the party was breaking the Race Relations Act by only allowing indigenous peoples to join, even though there is a large array of organisations out there that offer membership exclusively based on race, one of which is the Black Police Association. It seems that not only was this argument flawed, in that the BNP is there initially to represent the indigenous people anyway, but also incredibly bias and unfair. It seems that interest groups like the Black Police Association that are blatantly in favour of Tony Blair’s multicultural child are not affected by this Race Relations Act. That’s class A leftist bullying, which again points the finger at fascism. This is the British Establishment controlling an interest group and a political party, and attempting to change their values.
This isn’t democracy, and nor is this fair.
In the end, the BNP held an Extraordinary General Meeting that allowed members to vote in favour of the membership rule change anyway. But it didn’t end there. The Equalities and Human Rights Commission came back with a second attempt to bankrupt the party through expensive legal hearings, and further time wasting. The commission suggested that even though the party constitution had changed, there was scope for ‘indirect discrimination’, and this alone was worth further legal costs. Of course, this was a BNP victory given the sheer nonsensical nature of the hearing.
So what does this show? Quite clearly it shows the influence that Britain’s Leftist Establishment has on the British National Party. Commissions and Quangos like the EHRC have near unlimited funds, whilst the British National Party has to rely on funds provided by the members. Blatant attempts to bankrupt a party so that they are ‘out of the way’ are totally unacceptable in a democracy.
Chapter 4 – Can things change?
So can things change? The idea that someday in the United Kingdom there will be a Nationalist government seems pretty absurd to many people. However, with the recent rise of Nationalism throughout Europe, including Holland (once the most liberal country in the world) and France, I believe that the UK is destined to follow in their footsteps.
In order for this to happen, however, things must change. The only way I can see them changing, is if people begin to realise what exactly the British National Party stands for, and if the people can wake up to the realisation that the media is lying to them, is incredibly bias, and the Establishment is working against the will of the people.
I believe that this can only happen if the Establishment continues to work against the will of the people, and the media continues lying. Eventually, the lies will become more obvious and the effects of the corrupt and unpleasant Establishment will become even more noticeable. I believe that then, the people will realise, and the people will turn to Nationalism – their only hope.
Chapter 5 – Commentary
How can I prove that racism and hypocrisy exists in modern Britain amongst those who believe they are anti-racism and anti-discrimination? It’s really quite easy. You must simply listen to the things that ethnic ‘minorities’ say, which the ultra leftist and fascist British people agree with.
Ever heard a Pakistani person cal themselves a ‘British Pakistani’ ? Probably. In fact, I recall an Indian, or a Pakistani (or wherever) on the Nick Griffin/Question Time saga say that they are incredibly proud to be a ‘British Pakistani’. So what’s wrong with this? Let’s analyse it.
Consider what the racial foreigner actually means by ‘Pakistani’. Obviously, they are referring to their ethnic background or racial origin. Ethnically they are different to what they prefer to call the ‘white British’. The BNP acknowledges that – they’re ethno nationalists, of course they do. Though by these racial foreigners, these hypocritical scumbags, admitting they are a ‘British Pakistani’ they are openly agreeing with BNP policy. They are accepting that they are ethnically Pakistani, but civically British.
This is precisely what the BNP has been saying for decades, and it is only ever accepted when the ultra left and the foreigners say it – primarily because people overlook what the things they say actually mean! As soon as the ethno nationalists say the same thing, they are instantly branded racist or fascist. By the new meaning of the word, I’m happy to admit that I am a racialist – in that I accept that race is an important and defining characteristic of a person – but certainly by no means am I a racist. Certainly by no means, is any person aligning perfectly with the BNP a racist. As Andrew Brons said in his first Sky News Interview after the BNP EU breakthrough, ‘we hate nobody’.
So why am I so bothered about the ‘British Pakistani’ and ‘British Indian’ matter? Simply because it should work both ways. With a Pakistani admitting that they are only civically British – what does that make me?
By their own admission, it makes me a British Briton. ‘British’ meaning I’m civically British, and Briton defining my race. I am an ethnic Briton, as much as Trevor McDonald is presumably African, and that Sayeed Warsi is ethnically elsewhere – wherever that incapable and racist Muslim woman is from.
If we’re going to take care of such a small minded and frankly racist bunch of racial foreigners, in a way that they are allowed to acknowledge and appreciate their own ethnic heritage (think about Black History month) then as Arthur Kemp once said – ‘we claim that same right for ourselves!’
The British derive from the majority ethnic population prior to the 1948 British Nationality Act. Back in 1947, prior to mass immigration and the population change of our country, the majority population consisted of ‘white’ people. These peoples’ stock consisted mostly of Celtic, Norse and Anglo Saxon ethnicities.
Just because we British happen to be white, however, does not mean that all white people are ethnically British. This is what seems to confuse the lefties and the racial foreigners. The media and the leftist bigots would want you to believe that the BNP considers every white person British, but that’s absolutely not true.
What’s important to note with this matter of homogeneity and indigenous peoples, is that the BNP hasn’t made all of this up. This is a matter of facts. It is not a matter of ideology, opinion or anybody’s manifesto – indigenous people of different lands exist. End of story.
Consider the Maoris of New Zealand. Earliest evidence of these people living in their ethnic homeland is merely 700 years old – yet these people are internationally recognised as indigenous, and are protected by law. Now consider us forgotten British people. The ethnic British have lived in the British motherland for over 10,000 years – significantly longer than the Maoris in New Zealand. Yet we’re not recognised as indigenous in our own motherland.
So, to you who do not believe in an indigenous people of Great Britain, do share with me why you don’t believe. Denying an indigenous people existing in Great Britain is like denying that cheese exists.
It seems to me that the British people do not understand that they are an indigenous people.
I quote Andrew Brons, MEP in saying ‘Racism is terrible and must be codemned’. British public need to now peer through these permeable walls of lies created by the media, and see that the British National Party is not racist, but instead, Labour cronies who have destroyed our great nation. I once again quote from the Racism Cuts Both Ways documentation:
“The fact that council housing is refused to homeless white families living in sub-standard bed and breakfast accommodation in favour of so-called ‘asylum seekers’ and immigrants, means that this form of racism is now endemic across the country.”
If that’s not racism, I don’t know what is. And if the fact that nearly one third of white people have learnt to expect to be treated worse than other groups by at least one of eight public services (including police, prisons, courts, Crown Prosecution Service, probation service, local housing organisations, schools or GPs) is not a subsequent effect of prejudice for the indigenous people by the British Government (A government packed to the brim with racial foreigners who seem to still be convinced that the BNP want to send them home, and in turn, scare monger the British Public into thinking the BNP are Nazis), I also don’t know what is.
