I'm no poor cretin. And specific Liberals make me laugh.

The write up of the Baroness Warsi conference shall be here soon, as promised. I'll also see about uploading the audio.

But the reason for this post is this:

Anybody who believes that the British National Party is jingoist - is merely a fool!

(For any of you liberal students who think you're right about everything - a jingoist is somebody who believes their country is superior)

The British National Party loves culture - that's why we have an alliance with the likes of the French Front National.

Being British does not make you superior. It makes you British. And everybody should be proud to be of their ethnicity, and indeed an integral part of their culture - as much as any British person.

Being British does not make me better than any French man, Spanish man, Chinese man.

Racism - an unrelated and disgusting regime

Undoubtedly, racism is largely associated with the right - and you wouldn't be far wrong to say that all radical right-wingers (and I do mean, radical, not those who are leaning right, or predominantly right), but neo-nazis like Combat 18, a party who takes its name directly from Adolf Hitler himself (1 - A, 8 - H, alphabetically, respectively).

This, however, should not mean that right wingers are bad, irrational, extremist racists. Of course not - they make as many fair points, policies, and express valid ideologies, as those centre-right, centre-left, or extreme left. These opinions, and they are opinions, are just spread through communities of people, and in a perfect world, an equal amount or proportion of the population would be in favour of each political party that hoards different values (However, this circumstance would be far from perfect in a democratic world, as nobody could come into power through elections).

Opinions, however, are easily tainted (like I mentioned recently on my What You Always Thought blog). These ideologies that each offer their benefits, and each offer their disadvantages (though respective political parties would rather you think there are no disadvantages - what was that, Immigration was a great way of diversifying our culture, filling up new jobs, modernising and enforcing equality? Look at the mess we're in now.) - like protectionism on the right, and populism on the left, which can be portrayed quite easily by opposing parties as bad things, when they may well in fact be more beneficial than thought. There are two main forces behind the poisoning of opinion, and massive, unfair misrepresentation, present only to completely annihilate smaller opposing parties (which is one of the most definitive factors of fascism - though, the status fascism has to be extensively argued).

Fascism, up until the Second World War, where the ideology was ruined by Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust, was considered a Utopian vision, as was comminism. Which is interesting, given that communism and fascism are thought to be direct opposites of the left and the right. Doesn't this lead the way to proving that fascism has been poisoned over the years, from the abomination that was Adolf Hitler, and the years of false portrayal from the uber-liberal left (I'll perhaps pick up on the antics of the uber-left another time).

It's poisoned opinions. Media misrepresentation, and Media lies. Of course, must we forget Media bias? You need only watch Andrew Brons speaking on Channel 4 news, to see the blatant bias involved with the British National Party. (www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5rI3H0m5gU). Frankly, it's disgraceful that a valid politician of a valid and peaceful political party is constantly interrupted in favour of an MP of a more mainstream party (that's ruined the country, might I add), and verbally attacked by someone who is meant to be impartial (note the language, the twisting of words and the colloquialisms involved in a news broadcast
, aimed solely at Andrew Brons, and not Margaret Hodge.

This leads perfectly to my point regarding racism. I take my words here from Mr. Andrew Brons himself, as they are worded so perfectly.

Racism has many meanings, but most commonly it is believed to refer to racial hatred, and 'Racial hatred is unpleasant and must be condemned'. To hear this from Andrew Brons himself surely should be enough to bang through the skull of any BNP hater, and scream 'You've got us all wrong, yet you refuse to accept what is right in front of you'.

Continued, 'We must maintain the homogeneity of our own people'.

And that is precisely it.

The British National Party does not hate people of other races, or from other countries, or even those of other religions. There are Jewish member, and a convert Muslim even stood for the BNP further north!

Yet the media would like you to think so. If you were to watch the interview that I provided a link to, you will hear Krishnan comment on the 'fact' that the BNP want to send immigrants home. That is simply not true - but it is the sheer fact that he media, biassedly, bring up these things that are simply not true, that hold the party back. The party are stuck with the ignorance of modern voters who refuse to allow change. And it is this ignorance, that holds the leash on the open mindedness of our voters. Our voters are practically controlled by the media, and it is the media who have portrayed this great party as a racist organisation.

And this is simply not true.

The BNP believe that everybody has the right to their own culture. Those indigenous have the right to go about their own business and their own culture, without imposing cultures affecting their lives and indeed affecting their own culture.

Homogeneity of the indigenous is also very important - and it's this conservatism, if you will, which is often mistaken for racism. Immigrants and the children of immigrants are quite welcome to stay in our island country under a BNP government. There is no issue, and it's amazing to think that the media have made it seem like there is. The only issue is further immigration, leading to the irreversible and inevitable destruction of British culture, British heritage, and the indigenous Britons as a community. Monoculture would be the ultimate feat of treachery by any government, and this is why the BNP are fighting to avoid it.

There is nothing racist about fighting for the rights of people indigenous to their own country. If the BNP were racist, they would be instead enforcing the ideology that only indigenous Britons have the right to practice their own culture - and foreigners, whether in their own country or not, do not. But they don't. And this is why they are not racist.

The British National Party are a nationalist party, and hold great respect for other nationalists all over the world. Patriotism is a marvellous thing. It is not a discriminatory thing. Patriotism is the love for your own country, and that extends all over the world. Not just the United Kingdom.

If the word racist is going to be thrown around, then instead, it should be looked at this way.

The opposite of racism is loving all races, and believing all races have equal rights (I'd like to just point out that this is an ideology shared by BNP members alike, anyway).

So, if races were allowed to live amongst multiracial and multicultural societies from here onwards, and allowed to create multiracial families and communities - race, after a long period of time, would simply not come into the equation. Because there would be no race. There'd be monoculture. A monorace.

And to see the world the same, everywhere, with diverse culture little more than a historical interest, and the marvellous races of this nation non existent, would be a very sad day.

And anybody who enforces this, is in turn, racist themselves.

So how can a party that embraces other cultures, but enforces a traditional culture in their own land, be racist?

Don't call me a bloody Nazi! Why the BNP=/=Nazis

As touched on earlier in my other blog, Fascism is both difficult to define, and difficult to associate with a political organisation (Which I understand is particularly difficult to understand, thanks to the pests of the Unite Against Fascism, an organisation that knows as much about the party as a Labourite who refuses to share a room with anybody associated with the party. An organisation formed by a racial foreigner, who to me seems somewhat scared that the BNP would force him back to his country of derivation, which is of course, not what would happen under a British National Government). There are many variations of definition, and by combining popular definitions I, very briefly, deduced that the British National Party does not seem to fit the criteria of Fascism, nor does it seem to hold any Fascist ideologies.

What is interesting is that those who believe the BNP are Fascist, also tend to believe that they are Nazis. This is blatant ignorance and lack of understanding! The Nazis were not a Fascist organisation, and were in fact, largely anti-conservatism, anti-traditionalist, and indeed, pragmatic.

So, if I were to pretend that I was ignorant for just one moment, and claim that the British Nationalists were Fascist, then I could completely rule out any chance of them being at all associated with Nazism. Undoubtedly, the Nazis were an organisation of hatred, passion, prejudice and racism. But unlike what the ‘Hope Not Hate’ campaign would believe, the British National Party is an organisation of Nationalism, Passion, and Victory. That is, a desire for victory of the indigenous British Population once again obtaining their identity, and the restoration of the glory of the United Kingdom.

Sure, Nazis were pro-Germany as the British Nationalists are pro-Britain, but this ignorant observation surely cannot apply, as all horse-fanatics, Microsoft-Bums, and Apple-fanatics would be Nazis. Which is absurd which ever why you look at it.

It is also noted in mainstream media, that Nick Griffin is a man of the right. And I don’t completely deny that, and neither should any nationalist with an ounce of intelligent. The British National Party is without a doubt right-leaning, but I would not go as far to say that us British Nationals are far right, or even extremist-right. In fact, there are several aspects of the party that would imply that it was left-leaning, and even a Conservative party member wrote on their official website of the left ‘traits’ of the British National Party, and how it is of the up most importance that they should be stopped. We know that’s not true, but we do know that mainstream politicians openly acknowledge that the BNP is not either extremist right, or extremist left.

And this is precisely why the British National Party is very much far from being at all associated with Nazism. Time and time again I read bias articles concerning the British National Party, written even by indigenous persons who may well have been racially discriminated against in the past, and yet, do not recognise this. And it is the British National Party themselves who want to out this anti-white racism! So essentially, these people are shooting themselves in the foot.

Documentation published last year, the ‘Racism Cuts Both Ways’ campaign, features an article by Chairman Nick Griffin MEP, and I quote:
“You wouldn’t know this if you believe the propaganda of the mainstream media or the lies of the old party politicians. But most people who live in the real world will already have experience of being discriminated against. We all know that ‘positive discrimination’ denies perfectly well qualified individuals a fair chance when it comes to a job or a promotion. We all know of poor white areas that are left to rot while councils throw millions of pounds at ‘ethnic’ areas. We all know that Labour, Lib Dem and Conservative politicians use our money to give asylum-seekers luxury homes while homeless ex-servicemen sleep on the streets.

What many people don’t know, however, is that the indigenous peoples of Britain are not just the victims of such official anti-white racist bias. Huge and growing numbers also suffer criminal racism in its cruellest forms. Unreported by the mass media, ignored by schools, covered up by the old politicians- our people are the silent victims of an epidemic of racist violence, sexual exploitation and murder.”
If standing up for your own race and believing that every (NOTE THE EVERY) race has the right to not be treated as second class citizens in their country of derivation, and to be able to go about their own culture without mass imposition of foreign cultures affecting their way of life, then shoot me down now. Because I must be terribly ‘racist’.

Time and time again I quote Andrew Brons in saying that Racism is terrible and must be condemned. The British public need to now peer through these permeable walls of lies created by the media, and see that the British National Party is not racist, but instead, Labour cronies who have destroyed our great nation. I once again quote from 2008 documentation:

“The fact that council housing is refused to homeless white families living in sub-standard bed and breakfast accommodation in favour of so-called ‘asylum seekers’ and immigrants, means that this form of racism is now endemic across the country.”

If that’s not racism, I don’t know what is. And if the fact that nearly one third of white people have learnt to expect to be treated worse than other groups by at least one of eight public services (including police, prisons, courts, Crown Prosecution Service, probation service, local housing organisations, schools or GPs) is not a subsequent effect of prejudice for the indigenous people by the British Government (A government packed to the brim with racial foreigners who seem to still be convinced that the BNP want to send them home, and in turn, scare monger the British Public into thinking the BNP are Nazis), I also don’t know what is.

And finally, just to pick up on something I mentioned earlier. I told you that the Nazis were not a Fascist organisation, and were in fact, largely anti-conservatism, anti-traditionalist, and indeed, pragmatic. I could easily argue that the British Nationalists are far more conservative than the Conservative party themselves, and indeed, in this case, the British Nationalists stray further from Nazi ideologies.

The EDL thugs are NOT the BNP, and nor do we want them to be!

I'm beginning the process of merging my two blogs into one, simply because I find the articles generally overlap a little too much. So here's an article from Defying Perception.



These people are not the respectable indigenous subjects they seem to think they are. Their unacceptable behaviour and riots, riots near identical to that of the UAF pests, bring shame upon their organisation - and as much as I'd be pleased to see this organisation torn to pieces, I'm beginning to wish that they weren't all over the media.

More and more often is the British National Party being caught up in the media, and whilst recent victories have been made, the BNP are still struggling to stop the confused public seeing them as the violent thugs we see in protests like this.

The BNP is not the EDL.

The English defence league, already described by Nick Griffin (Chairman, BNP, MEP) as nothing more than a 'honey trap', organised by either the state or the far-left, is nothing more than a band of violent thugs fighting for what, in some areas, is right. The real problem is their belief that the British National Party is bad, and the means by which they 'express' their views.

Take a look at the photograph below.




In a protest organised by the far left, liberal, nansy pansy pests of the UAF (Who do not seem to understand the word Nazi, or indeed, Fascism) and the thugs of the English Defence League, we see a pitiful stand against the British National Party - a legitimate political party, with national electorate support, which ultimately, has nothing to do with either of these organisations.

It's these inconsiderate, ignorant, and frankly opressing campaigners that do not cease to confuse the British public - and this is what needs to be recognised these days. Be it by the police force (though, it is perfectly legal to express political view and distribute material in the streets - hence, I'd suggest a system by which organisations must steer clear, and out of different areas to one another, when preaching to the people), or simply by media coverage, and better explanation of who these campaigners are, and what exactly they're doing.

But of course, in a society where smaller political parties are opressed, and violent thugs are allowed to roam the streets, doing little more than disrupting unhappy shoppers, we can never expect good cover from the media, but even worse, we can never expect fair cover.

It's becoming more and more apparent that the Great British public seem to think the English Defence Leage are associated with the British National Party, and it is of the upmost importance that the word is spread that they are not.

The British National Party is peaceful, it's members are respectable, and never, would violence become a core component of it's political strategy.

Baroness Warsi - An experiment.

I'm currently at a conference regarding politics, economics, the media and young people. Baroness Warsi is due to speak soon. Let's see if she can go five minutes without complaining about the BNP. I'll try my best to record, upload and transcribe, but I believe I'll be receiving a DVD copy of the event. Stay tuned.